It was not until
recently I read a book on philosophy that I got preliminary understanding of
what I would go through and what I should do in future. Though the target of
life never seems obscure to me, and I have an outline for coming life and a
schedule for daily life, I agree that my understanding of life is not deep
enough to reach a higher level, therefore it is ‘preliminary’—I still have a
long way to go.
Now let me
introduce what the book says. There are three stages of one’s life. The first
stage is in which one can not distinguish between himself/herself and the
object or the environment he/she encounters. The person, often a small child,
lives in a natural way that every action from him/her is not purposely. Follows
the second stage in which one can clearly tell himself/herself apart from
others and the environment, and does something for an aim. We should remark
that each stage, including the following third stage does not happen in one’s
life separately. They may concur in one’s life. For instance, a man can work
for earning bread for his family. In that way he does something purposely,
being in the second stage. He can also simply walk home leisurely without an
apparent intention(though he is to return home, he would forget the distance
and the aim, simply enjoy walking), in which he is in the first stage. Now it’s
really complicated. The more complicated one—the third stage ensues. For common
people, seldom does an individual reach the third stage in his/her life. Even
if one touches the threshold of this enigmatic stage, it is usually momentary
and vanishes without trace.
The third stage
of one’s life comes when after one realizes the difference between self and
others or the environment, he/she transcends this notion which restricts
his/her behavior but finally is overcame by him/her in some way. That is to
say, one returns being natural, but different from being natural because he/she
has gone through being unnatural and gradually extricates himself/herself from
the constraint.
To illustrate
these enigmatic conceptions, consider the steps of learning English. Firstly we
learn English because we are taught to learn English. And we learn when we were
not aware of the importance of English. Then grades in exam demonstrate the
importance of English. After we came here, exams burden us no severely as
before, but we still endeavor to learn English because it concerns whether we
can communicate with others. We try as possible to memorize words and apply
them into essays and daily conversations. Then, it will become a portion of
ourselves. Like Chinese, English comes out of our mouth without the slightest
efforts. Gradually and finally, we reach the third stage.
Life goes the
same way. One can say Tao Yuanming, the famous idyllist, was murmuring in his
poems, complaining his unfortunate and pretending to be out of the secular world.
The other one can also say that he let his mind flow freely with the pace of
nature. The first one is mundane and his/her mind has been covered with dust,
therefore, he/she cannot understand the mindset of Tao. Perhaps throughout this
miserable person’s life, he/she could never enter in the world where his/her
mind could swing with all the living things. In contrast, the second one is a
little more sapient, though this person may still linger in the second stage
and may not be a person like Tao.
I recalled a
blog written by cute boy, Mr. Triton. He talked about happiness and I wondered
that when we intentionally pursue for happiness, whether we could obtain the
real happiness. I thought now that we have unavoidably transformed from a child
into a young adult, we could be glad as before, but not be as happy as a child.
And I argued that the more we desired a childlike mind, the further we were
away from it because I thought a truly child mind could never be intentionally
achieved.
However, the
book points out the possibility. The way is unknown, maybe it depends on
different people. Since I don’t know a lot, I have to make an end for this part
hastily.
The most amazing
thing I recognized was the perpetual law: deny
of deny. In syntax, there is no difference between the outcome of deny of
deny and the original word. Nonetheless, in the journey of life, the life after
deny of deny(the third stage) is totally different from the original one(the
first stage). It is a brand new stage where one stands on the vertex of life
and could overlook all the other things.
And may one day
I am able to reach the condition that Laozi once depicted: Aim to do things
without aim.
It is not surprising that your posting attracted not a single comment from you classmates. To explain some philosophical ideas or issues is difficult enough; to do so in a class blog is even more daunting. It is amazing that you even dare to attempt to write on the three stages life in blog. Few can understand what you have written. I must confess I don't understand most of it.
ReplyDeleteI have considered the scenarios before i wrote this blog. But I want to have a try because this is a landmark of the development of my thinking. Far as I tried, I still could not illustrate it in a understandable way. But it's worthy, isn't it? Great writers need courage!
ReplyDeletewell, obviously you have made some obstacles in our reading by "applying your new words".
ReplyDeletealthough i have to admit i did not quite get through this article, i think to reach the second stage is not so difficult but it is really
tough to approach the third phase.
maybe life is not just three stages but a combination of different attitudes and emotions. and how can the writer just say the third is higher than the first.
maybe i am destined not to be a philosipher